Six More Months of 2011

   July, 2011.  After discovering how extremely negative our financial posture has become, people all over the nation are beginning to ask, just how on earth did we manage to come to such a precarious position?

   It didn’t happen overnight — and it didn’t happen primarily because of Bush or any other single politician or any one party.  Perhaps we need to take a serious look at history.  We just might find some answers if we look very carefully.

   Let’s start with FDR.  His New Deal certainly started the ball rolling with a notable acceleration.  And then when World War II ended, our debt receded from what had been approximately 100% of our GDP.

   Then, along came LBJ and his Great Society.  This is often referred to as the beginning of our contemporary welfare state.

   That’s when Medicare was launched and we were told not to worry, it would only cost about $12 billion by the 1990s.  Of course it cost us over $110 billion over that time period.  And then Medicaid came on the scene and similarly exploded into a major expense.

   And that was only the beginning.  Then there was public housing, food stamps and so many other massive welfare programs, all of which automatically escalated to astounding figures — in the trillions of dollars.

   These are what we sometimes hear referred to as "unfunded liabilities" and "mandatory spending."  Now such amounts, along with other similar spending, come to over $2.1 trillion a year.  Our national defense was recently calculated as just 4.8% of our GDP, so we can’t lay the blame there, can we?

   As reported by The Wall Street Journal, "Spending, as a share of GDP, in the last three years is higher than at any time since 1946."  And noted, "In three years, the debt has increased by more than $4 trillion, thanks to stimulus, cash for clunkers, mortgage modification programs, 99 weeks of jobless benefits, record expansions in Medicare, and more."

   And how does our future look?  "The forecast is for $8 trillion to $10 trillion more in red ink through 2021." And that doesn’t really consider many of the new entitlements, such as with a full consideration of the new Obama healthcare monstrosity.

   As noted by Senator Tom Coburn, "Our government is twice as big as it was 10 years ago."  So, how does any country ever manage to survive all of this?  It doesn’t.

==========================

   For quite some time now we have known about our precarious financial condition.  It’s no secret anymore. So what has our gigantic federal bureaucracy been doing to get things under control?  Let’s take a look and see.

   The UK’s Daily Mail reveals that, "U.S. gives billions of dollars in foreign aid to the world’s richest countries — then asks to borrow it."  Isn’t that brilliant?

   Michael Saltsman (of the Employment Policies Institute) tells us that, "Nearly 30% of its lowest wage earners reported reduced hours or layoffs after San Francisco passed a paid-leave ordinance."  Not at all surprising for San Francisco where they shoot themselves in the foot on an almost daily basis.

   And let us not forget our dear Fannie Mae.  As the Associated Press recently reported, "Federal regulators issued a blistering report about mortgage giant Fannie Mae, alleging accounting manipulation that lined executives’ pockets and lies about smooth growth in profits and earnings.

   The regulators report "...said Fannie Mae employees manipulated accounting so that senior executives could collect millions in bonuses from 1998 until 2004, when its accounting came under the regulators’ scrutiny."

   And, as accounted by Peter Wallison, who was a part of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, "Fannie Mae did not contribute marginally to the financial crisis.  It was the source of the declining mortgage underwriting standards that brought down the system."

   Yes, that’s one of the two big government mortgage giants that Rep. Barney Frank and Sen. Chris Dodd were supposed to be watching and who told us that everything was okay.  And what have we done about that?  Why, of course we saw the Dodd-Frank overhaul put in place.  Yes, that’s right — the same ones who did so much to help us to get into trouble in the first place.

   So, let’s take a look at that overhaul.  As detailed by the WSJ, "The Dodd-Frank financial overhaul was designed to end the prospect that the U.S. would ever again step in to save a large, failing financial firm."

   Did it work?  As further noted,, "A recent report by rating firm Standard & Poors has inflamed the debate saying Dodd-Frank hasn’t changed the market’s belief that extraordinary government support for some large firms is still possible."

   So now you have a better understanding about all the wonderful things our government has been doing to get things under control.  Don’t you feel better about things now?

==========================

   We have seen many interesting comparisons between Bernie Maddoff and our federal government’s Social Security program.  They have been all over the Internet for some time now.  Generally, the comparisons read as follows:

   BERNIE MADDOFF took money from investors and promised that the funds would be invested and made available to them later on.  SOCIAL SECURITY took money from working Americans and promised that the funds would be invested in a "trust fund" and made available to them later on.

   BERNIE MADDOFF, instead of investing the money, he spent it for his own interests.  SOCIAL SECURITY, instead of investing the money in the "Trust Fund," the politicians used it for their own interests — pork barrel bribes and giveaways and general spending.

   BERNIE MADDOFF paid off investors with money taken from new investors.  SOCIAL SECURITY paid off retirees with money taken from new and younger working Americans to pay off the old folks.

   BERNIE MADDOFF’s scheme was discovered and no money was available anymore and everybody lost. SOCIAL SECURITY will run out of available money and what will happen to those responsible?

   BERNIE MADDOFF was prosecuted, convicted and remains in prison.  SOCIAL SECURITY’s responsible politicians are either comfortably retired or remain in Washington, doing the same as always.

   It’s as simple as that.

==========================

   The information we have given you on the contemporary economics of our nation this month and for a few years now on our web site, gives you a most unfortunate but very accurate accounting of our problem.  So, what do some of our business leaders have to say about what’s been going on?  Let’s examine a couple of the many available examples.

   Investor’s Business Daily published comments made this month by Bernie Marcus, the head honcho of Home Depot.  He said, in part, "I can tell you that the impediments that the government imposes are impossible to deal with.  Home Depot would never have succeeded if we’d tried to start it today."

   The other example is from a conference call with Steve Wynn, the very successful hotel/casino entrepreneur and long time Democrat.  His comments ended up being transmitted all over the Internet and includes the observation:  "I’m telling you that the business community in this country is frightened to death of the weird political philosophy of the President of the United States.  And, until he’s gone, everybody’s going to be sitting on their thumbs."

   And there’s plenty more where that came from.

==========================

   With all that’s been happening, what do we see happening in The White House?  Well, we see that the First Lady evidently now requires a grand total of 26 personal servants.  One might wonder, if she were asked about this, in light of the suffering and economic chaos, would she say "let them eat cake?"

   Reactions to our trying times from the public include such things as Grassfire Nation Patriot Action Network and others, launching a "Government Spending Addiction Intervention Week."  This happened near the end of this month, but I’ll bet you never heard about it in the left-wing press or on the liberal network news, now did you?

   Actually, it’s not a bad idea.  It’s the sort of thing that we should have as a national event every year.  Then nobody could know about it on an annual basis.

==========================

   The ominous headlines continue: "Worries Grow Over Jobs," "Little Hiring Seen By Small Business," "Raters Put U.S. on Notice," "Fall in Property-Tax Revenue Squeezes Cities," "Layoffs Deepen Gloom," "Job Search Stretches Past a Year for Millions," "Markets Swoon on Debt Fear,"....and on and on it goes.

   And what have we got?  Among other things, we’ve got 9.2% unemployment.  We’ve got sharp job losses in the fields of insurance, telecommunications, residential construction, health care retailers, and so many others similarly effected in an adverse way by government controls and over-regulation.

   And in the welfare state of California we see a massive reverse migration out of the tarnished golden state.  And, wonder of wonders, there are even some illegal aliens going back to Mexico.  (And there is that joke going around about a truck full of people caught while being smuggled across the border.  Trouble is, it was out-of-work Americans trying to get into Mexico.)

   Don’t laugh. It could happen.

==========================

   Other things to think about this month:  Our national debt increase under Clinton was approx. $547 million per day.  Under Bush it was approx. $1.6 billion per day.  And now, under Obama it’s a whopping $4.1 billion per day and rising!  (These are accurate, nationally reported figures.)

   And now a just released report from the Congressional Budget Office tells us that the federal government’s publicly held debt is expected to expand to as much as 101 percent of the GDP in just ten years!

   And how is all of this reflected throughout the rest of the world?  China has upped its lead in global exports and it is being said that China is soon expected to overtake America — something that worries many folks all over the world.  Nobody’s sure exactly that’s going to mean.

   Whatever all of this means, you can be sure, it won’t be good for us.

==========================

   The debt ceiling/debt reduction negotiations near the end of this month became a drama like no other — a drama of desperation and unbelievable ignorance. It has also been a significant learning experience (for those few willing to learn).

   It started to gather a little momentum in the early part of the month.  The president started out by actually suggesting reductions in medicare and other vitals, but of course never really addressing the enormous size and waste that has become our national government.

   He continued with such statements as, "I cannot guarantee that those checks go out (Social Security checks, etc.) ... if we haven’t resolved this issue. Because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it."

   However, official treasury reports told us an entirely different story.  The reports state that the continuing flow of federal tax revenue, "...has been more than sufficient to cover the combined costs of federal spending on interest payments, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, the Veterans Affairs department and federal workers’ wages and insurance benefits, including wages and insurance benefits for military personnel."  (CNS News)

   It would certainly seem, from this and from so many other examples, we cannot be sure of anything our president ever tells us.  It is a situation that can only hurt us, on so many levels.

==========================

   Things started to unfold, little by little.  Senators McConnell and Reid tried to do what they were separately determined to do if they could.  Obama pushed for his idea of a debt deal, without specifics, even as he continued to reject various Republican plans offered.

   The House approved a Republican "Cut, Cap and Balance" bill (touted as a reasonable answer).  House Speaker Boehner found White House negotiations unworkable and turned to Senate leaders.  The Democratic party controlled Senate rejected the "Cut, Cap and Balance" bill.

   Debt talks reached gridlock as Sen. Reid and Obama kill all possibilities of compromise.  And the White House added that if any of that should ever get through the Senate, the president will veto it — referring to the Boehner House plan or anything else like it.  Of course it passed the House and never got through the Democrat controlled Senate.

   Then Senate Democrat leaders led by Harry Reid, held a press conference, after tabling the Boehner bill. Reid tried to tell everyone that the Republicans were somehow orchestrating some sort of filibuster to thwart any progress.  (This writer knows, without any doubt that all of these things happened.  This writer watched it all on C-Span, on news videos, in official releases, etc.)

   It became more like the Mad Hatter’s tea party with every passing day.

==========================

   It’s been almost unbelievable.  Obama said, "Work with me — give me something," and after 5 plans and three major bill were all rejected out of hand by Obama and his Democrats, somehow it’s the GOP that’s not cooperating?

   So then Boehner says to Obama, "All right, if you don’t like anything we try to do, then you give us a detailed plan to work from." Obama’s answer was, once again, a resounding "No."

   And the Senate Democrats continued to be unable to produce anything with any sort of meaningful financial reform.  As one unidentified observer noted, "They’re like drug addicts who can’t kick the habit."

==========================

   Then finally, at the last moment, and sad little compromise was reached.

   Reuters - 7/31/11: "President Barack Obama announced on Sunday that Democrats and Republican leaders have reached an agreement to reduce the U.S. deficit and avoid default."

   Finally it happened.  With over two years of total control, the majority party wasn’t even able to come up with any sort of workable budget.  And now it has only happened, with a "sort of" debt reduction agreement, at the last minute, after enormous pressure from a new House of Representatives and a disgusted public.

   And even so, it is being suggested by some that it is primarily window dressing and will not amount to any real reform that means much of anything.  This writer thinks it could be at least a poor start toward serious reform, but it will have to be accompanied by massive additional efforts, far more courageous than what has been seen so far.

   What will happen now?  Time will tell.

==========================

   Are there any serious suggestions concerning long term solutions to our budget and our general economic problems?  Yes, there have been a few interesting suggestions.

   One idea is that we should seriously consider the Canadian solution.  They turned more to the right on financial matters and now their economy is growing much faster than ours.

   There is also significant interest in a real Congressional Reform Act that will have term limits, no special tenure advantages, Congressional coverage with Social Security and no taxpayer-paid Congressional retirement plan, coverage under the same healthcare programs that the rest of us must endure, etc., etc.

   And the enormous give-away and pork-barrel programs have got to be stopped dead in their tracks. You’ve read some of the examples listed within these pages.  There is so much more.  There are millions going to Hollywood producers, stockcar racetrack owners, Caribbean rum producers, and many, many thousands more that must be kicked away from the public trough.

   There is a very credible organization known as Citizens Against Government Waste that issues a list of prime cuts every year.  If followed, that alone could save us at least two trillion dollars over a five year period.  That’s not chump change.

   And, of the greatest importance of all, we must reduce the size of and the oppressive interference from our federal government.  That would bring us back in line faster than you might ever imagine.

   We can do this without sacrificing the elderly, our military, our personal health, or any other critical mandate.  (But of course ObamaCare has got to be removed, or we will lose everything.)

   That’s how this writer and a number of others in our nation feel about the ways and means of actually solving this most serious problem.  What do you think about it?

==========================

   The American legal system has been going through a general decline, right along with just about everything else.  That’s not only obvious from our continuing coverage, you can see it as well in everyday life.  Most attorneys cost many hundreds of dollars an hour at best, and at worst, thousands of dollars an hour.  In other words, it’s not a matter of justice, it’s a matter of how much justice you can afford.

   Holder’s Justice Department seems now to stand as the most obvious example of our serious decline in this area of great importance.  And we have seen so many situations that highlight this major deficiency.

   One immediate sampling of this could well be in the current deadly gun smuggling fiasco with Mexico.  As reported by Doug Book on the Patriot Action Network, "Since whistleblowers brought this scheme to the attention of Congress early this year, Senator Charles Grassley and Congressman Darrell Issa have been frustrated by Department of Justice stonewalling, subterfuge, and misrepresentation."

   And, as further noted, "It is attorney David Hardy’s contention that the leadership at the Department of Justice, the ATF and perhaps the FBI and DEA are in violation of the Arms Export Control Act of 1976."

   As pointed out: "Written to make certain that members of the executive branch do not ‘mistakenly’ sell arms to terrorists or tyrants, the Act clearly states that a president selling ‘defense articles’ to another nation must first receive a permit from the Secretary of State.

   "As attorney Hardy concludes, ‘...the firearms involved were not being exported for official use by an agency, nor as part of foreign aid."  (You can get confirmation and further information from this report, from WesternJournalism.com and FlovdReports.com.)

==========================

   The Justice Department, and its Attorney General Eric Holder have been further spotlighted by Representative Allen West:  "A new member of Congress said that a special prosecutor needs to review the actions of Attorney General Eric Holder regarding the ‘Fast and Furious’ gun scandal where weapons were sold to carriers known to supply Mexican drug lords." (From reporter Michael Carl of WND.)

   Rules and regulations seem to be breaking down just about everywhere.  As The Wall Street Journal reports, "Congressional rules require public proposals and specific numbers that be openly debated."  We see how little that happens these days.

   Does anyone follow the rule of law anymore? Evidently not too many.  There seems to be precious few investigative procedures, prosecutions, or penalties being followed and applied.

   It is a difficult time for everyone when law and order is so uncertain.

==========================

   Other problems with our legal system include the following from a Washington Times article:  "Forty-nine Republican members of Congress have asked the House Judiciary Committee to ‘promptly investigate’ Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s role in preparing a legal defense for President Obama ... when she served as Solicitor General.

   In a letter to committee Chairman Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, and the panel’s ranking Democrat, John Conyers Jr. of Michigan, the lawmakers said that ‘contradictory to her 2010 confirmation testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee,’ recently released Justice Department documents show that Justice Kagan ‘actively participated with her Obama administration colleagues in formulating a defense’ for the law."  This was all in regard to questionable law involved with legislation passed for this administration.

   Also reported:  "Lawmakers, including 10 doctors and GOP presidential candidates Rep. Ron Paul of Texas and Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, said the recently released Justice Department documents raise ‘serious questions’ about Justice Kagan’s ability to ‘exercise objectivity’ in any case involving the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that comes before the Supreme Court."

   Another nail in our coffin?  It would seem so, if nothing is done about things like this.

==========================

   As we move ever deeper into the convoluted legal system, we realize that court and enforcement authorities are still telling us that ignorance of the law is no excuse.  They also tell us that prosecutors don’t have to show that there is ever any criminal intent.

   But, as reported in the WSJ, "The U.S. Constitution mentions three federal crimes by citizens: treason, piracy and counterfeiting.  By the turn of the 20th century, the number of criminal statutes numbered in the dozens.

   "Today, there are an estimated 4,500 crimes in federal statutes, according to a 2008 study by retired Louisiana State University law professor John Baker."  And that doesn’t even count the many thousands of complicated and sometimes conflicting case law decisions that must be considered and the thousands of new regulations.

   There must be a million ways you can break the law and never know it. Ignorance of the law is no excuse? What is impossible, is to know.  Ignorance is guaranteed.  Even most lawyers and judges show a high degree of confusion, disagreement, and general uncertainty in these areas.

   It would seem that once again you’re damned no matter what.

==========================

   Andy Rooney is credited with so many interesting "Did you know?" questions.  One set that’s been making the rounds on the Internet for some time (and is back again) includes the following:

   "Did you know that carved on the top front fascia of the U.S. Supreme Court building is a relief sculpture that includes Moses holding the Ten Commandments?

   Don’t feel bad if you didn’t know all of that.  With the growing federal court attacks against any display of religious ideas or symbols in public places, it really is a surprise to many people.

==========================

   Daniel L. Dreisbach, a Constitutional scholar and Professor of Justice, Law and Society at the American University, gave a significant lecture at Hillsdale College in 2006.  With today’s increasing pressure to enforce the perceived concept of Constitutional separation of Church and State (which is a phrase found nowhere in our Constitution), it is felt that at least some of the Professor’s words need to be read and remembered once again.

   Jefferson wrote:  "Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church and State."

   And, as the Professor further noted, "Jefferson’s wall (that ‘separation of Church and State’) was constructed in the service of the free exercise of religion.  Use of the metaphor to restrict religious exercise — e.g., to disallow a citizen’s religious expression in the public square — conflicts with the very principle Jefferson hoped his metaphor would advance."

   Of course we can’t use common sense and apply the law as actually originally intended, right?  Or can we?

==========================

   I thought California was just about the most dysfunctional state of all time, but it would seem that Arizona has become a serious contender.

   It isn’t enough that the poor state has enormous border problems with Mexico.  And it isn’t enough that there is practically a war between the federal government and the state, as poor Arizona tries to defend itself.

   And it isn’t enough that there has been so many scandals — like that 14-year-old girl who was sold twice by a parent.  (It evidently wasn’t illegal for a family to sell a child in the state of Arizona.)

   Now we are getting an earful and an eyeful of a rather colorful breakdown in the little town of Quartzsite, Arizona (population approx. 3,800).  As reported by Joe Kovacs for WND:

   "A small town in Arizona is suddenly a YouTube sensation after a town hall meeting devolved into a physical clash as a woman was forcibly removed from speaking during the public portion of the event.

   As further reported, "Jones ... who publishes the Desert Freedom Press was addressing matters of taxation and meeting protocol.  Some councilmembers interrupted Jones as she was addressing the council and audience, ordering her to relinquish the microphone. ... Mayor Ed Foster came to the defense of Jones."

   And then, as noted, "Jones was able to speak for a few moments more, but councilmembers insisted police move in and subdue her. ... When Jones refused to give up the microphone, officers forcibly removed her from the premises, and cited her for disorderly conduct. Jones suffered a torn ligament in her elbow during the scuffle, and was transported to La Paz Regional Hospital."

   It was also observed that, "Mayor Foster, a retired Marine and former engineer for Wrigley Chewing Gum, is standing by Jones’ account, and says the town council and the police department are filled with corruption.

   On Sunday morning (July 10, 2011) Mayor Ed Foster issued a release that said, in part:  "Quartzsite is officially in a State of Emergency.  According to most police, this would indicate that normal law is suspended."

   The Mayor’s statement also noted that, "The right to declare a state of emergency is a state mandated right that is held only by the elected Mayor of a municipality."

   Also mentioned, was some of the media confusion. "The AZ central story makes no mention whatsoever of the Quartzsite 10 — ten police officers representing 80% of the police force — who have accused the Chief of Police of criminal activity."

   In conclusion he said, "I fully expect these people to continue their illegal activities in the wake of the national media attention they are now receiving.  We will continue to expose these acts and report their illegal meetings, demanding accountability and an independent audit of the financial records to determine the extent of the crimes committed in Quartzsite."

   Wow!

==========================

   The battle in Quartzsite, Arizona goes on and on.  And as reported by Gary Hunt’s Outpost of Freedom, "An on again, off again, meeting was held in Quartzsite, Arizona, on Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 10:00AM. ... The Mayor declared that the meeting was illegal, since it was scheduled during the illegal meeting of Sunday, and is not being held at the normal 7:00 PM meeting time, as stipulated in Town Code.

   It was also observed, "The council, absent the mayor, continued the meeting with Vice Mayor Barbara Cowell presiding over the meeting."

   As we move on, July 20 brings us transmissions from Joe Kovacs (WND) who tells us, "The state of Arizona is now investigating allegations of massive corruption among government officials in Quartzsite, Ariz." and it is further reported that, " ‘I’m no longer getting paid as mayor,’ said Ed Foster, the elected head of Quartzsite. ‘That’s not a big deal, but it’s in the town code that I get a stipend of $400.  If they made a decision to withdraw my stipend, they have to do it in public, so just the decision to do it in private is another violation of the open-meeting law.’ "

   Another WND report says additionally that, "The mayor also says the vast majority of officers on the town’s small police force are in the process of being let go merely because they don’t support the actions of Chief Gilbert.  ‘They’re being fired,’ he said.  ‘They took their police reports to the U.S. Attorney’s office to file a formal complaint about this today.’

   It is further noted that, "The letter also says it constitutes a direct order not to discuss the matter with anyone outside the investigation."  Well, I guess that’s one way to try to button things down and cover over the whole mess, at least for a little while.

==========================

   Other towns and cities in Arizona have had all sorts of problems over the years, as have so many places all over America.  It hasn’t been easy and it isn’t getting any better.

   And yes, of course there are good things happening out there.  But this work is an accounting of the many problems of the Obama era, with historic references to past eras as well.  It’s problems that we have got to face up to and deal with.  Wouldn’t you agree?

   So, for now, let’s conclude this series of observations about current breakdowns, with the immediate example at hand, and look back a bit and see the long-term nature of such issues.

   This writer recalls serious dysfunctions in the civil courts of the Phoenix area, going back several years, where a friend had to become a fugitive.  The judge there awarded his wife more than his total assets, in the conclusion of the divorce action.  And no, there were no extenuating circumstances.  He had also never beaten her.  And they were only married for a few years.  And they had no children.

   Then, after the judge’s verdict was given, the judge and the plaintiff went out and celebrated.  How nice for them.  And yes, there are plenty more examples of such judicial irresponsibilities.

   You may be aware of the beautiful, scenic community of Sedona, Arizona.  What you are probably not aware of is the irresponsible "frontier justice" that has been known to occur in that setting.

   One example, of just a few years back, is of an extortionist and manipulator type personality who confronted various hapless souls with all sorts of confrontations and trumped-up charges, which he hoped would be to his financial gain.

   There actually are a number of predators like that out there who have learned how to "game" the system.  The more sophisticated enforcement, prosecutory and judiciary elements are often aware of such people and don’t let them get away with such irresponsible behavior.

   These elements of law in the Sedona area seem to have been (and evidently remain) completely ignorant with regard to such problems.  And therefore, as you might imagine, this has ended up causing substantial harm to those who have had the misfortune to become victims of this sort of Sedona "frontier justice."

   The issuance of an arrest warrant because the authorities had the wrong address, ignoring the "set-up" that was initiated by the complainant, an early trial error and dismissal and reinitiating, a postponement because of a sick judge but an automatic guilty verdict when the hapless defendant was ill and had an excuse from a physician, and uncountable additional "kangaroo court" operations — all of this and more has done considerable damage to the innocent.

   And who did all of this?  Yes, it was the local police investigators, the Sedona City Attorney, the various judges and some of the most incompetent attorneys known to man.  Yes, that town has a lot to be ashamed of, as do so many other towns and cities throughout the American legal system.  It is one damn mess to be sure.

==========================

   The comments, the activities, and the unfortunate results keep piling up from the left.  One of the many unsettling Obama quotes that we see coming up again and again:  "It’s tempting to bypass Congress and change the rules on my own."  And his Executive Orders are proving to be a clear attempt to do just that.

Another thing that Obama still wants is some kind of National Civilian Community Corps.  The original attempt from his "Give Act" proposed that, "The Director determines appropriate uniforms.  Membership will be mandatory.  Units to be assigned to campuses..."

   As Obama stated, "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set.  We’ve got to have a Civilian National Security Force that is just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."

   That sounds disquietingly like the words of Adolph Hitler as he set up the "Brown Shirts" and Hitler Youth programs.  (Thank you Anna Dewey for refreshing our memories.)

   One of the many glaring results of our left-leaning policies is the end of our manned space transportation system.  Our space shuttle is no more.  Our scientists are being fired.

   And, as headlines point to the growing shortage of young scientists, The Washington Times gives us this Rep. Roscoe Bartlett quote:  "I watch the White House and the people they invite there and slobber all over. They’re not academic achievers.  They’re athletes and entertainers."

   Thus we see the stuff that national declines and falls are made of.

==========================

   New and highly irresponsible government healthcare decisions and actions aren’t restricted to ObamaCare alone.  We have found these aberrations leaking into just about every area of federal tomfoolery.

   One of the newest Federal Drug Administration (FDA) declarations serves as a sterling example.  It is reported here from TheNewAmerican.com:

   "Because Diamond Foods made truthful claims about the health benefits of consuming walnuts that the FDA didn’t approve, it sent the company a letter declaring ‘Your walnut products are drugs’ — and ‘new drugs’ at that — and, therefore, ‘they may not legally be marketed ... in the United States without an approved new drug application.’  The agency even threatened Diamond with ‘seizure’ if it failed to comply."

   You think that’s crazy?  You should read this next one by Drew Zahn from World Net Daily.  It’s about an application for coverage and funding under Medicaid. It part it goes as follows:

   "Undercover citizen Journalist James O’Keefe is at it again, this time capturing on video an Ohio government worker helping a ‘drug dealer’ commit Medicaid fraud.

   These examples seem totally unbelievable, but they are all too real.  This writer has seen the FDA letter. This writer has seen the O’Keefe video.  It’s all part of the process we go through to authenticate the reports we receive.

   Yes, it is all too real and it is the way things are now done in much of our new government’s operations, on all levels.  You have been forewarned.

==========================

   The nasty attacks, the falsehoods, the voting corruptions, and all the rest are coming out in full force for the 2012 election.  You’ve read our accounting of this sort of thing in this past mid-term election period, right?

   Also, you’re aware of the questionable legality of a big part of the Hispanic registration and voting in the Los Angeles area?  You know about the S.E.I.U. control of the election machinery in Nevada?  Well, here we go again.  Consider all of that and so much more for the upcoming presidential election.

   From a letter by a new Congressman (who has the audacity to be a conservative Black — Allen West): "Before I was in office even 30 days, the liberal Democrat machine launched negative radio ads, phone calls, and web ads against me."

   And, Newsmax magazine reports, "Dead people can’t cast votes?  Well, they’re not supposed to — but they are donating many thousands of dollars every year to political campaigns.  In some cases, the donations may be illegal.  (Do you think?)

   "The dearly departed have donated more than $540,000 to political causes over the past eight years, according to a Congressional Quarterly MoneyLine report."  (This was reported some time ago, and our sources suggest it is still going on hard and strong today.)

   And currently Jim Kouri reports in the Law Enforcement Examiner, "One of President Barack Obama’s favorite organizations, La Raza — The Race — has teamed up with a federal agency to promote on of the administration’s many government cash giveaways with Spanish ads encouraging Latinos — including legal and illegal immigrants — to apply for U.S. taxpayer dollars to pay for housing."

   It is our understanding that this minority will be made very much aware of the political source of such funds.  And the timing couldn’t be better for the coming election.

   And the WSJ is reporting that, "Democrats in California appear set to gain more power in new maps of the state’s electoral districts finalized Friday, raising the hackles of Republicans and reflecting the Golden State’s leftward shift."

   With all of this and so much more, the only question remaining is whether or not truly honest elections are a thing of the past in today’s America.

==========================

   While we’re on the subject of ethical behavior, perhaps we should review some of the other behavioral disappointments.  (And, we might add, at least some are being examined more closely, thanks to a new majority in at least one of the legislative bodies of Congress.)

   As reported by Jerry Seper in The Washington Times, "A coalition of reform groups wants the House Committee on Ethics to resume its work on the long-pending investigation of Rep. Maxine Waters and provide a public accounting of the status of the case against the California Democrat."

   And, as reported by Joel Millman in The Wall Street Journal, "Democratic U.S. Rep. David Wu faced calls for his resignation from some in his party after the state’s largest newspaper (The Oregonian) published reports ... of an alleged unwanted advance in November by Mr. Wu toward a young California woman, the daughter of a longtime Wu supporter."

   And Judicial Watch has announced the list of the "Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians for 2009."  (Judicial Watch is a very credible public interest group that investigates government corruption.)  The names on that list are:

    1.  Senator Christopher Dodd.

    2.  Senator John Ensign.

    3.  Rep. Barney Frank.

    4.  Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geitner.

    5.  Attorney General Eric Holder.

    6.  Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr.

    7.  President Barack Obama.

    8.  Rep. Nancy Pelosi.

    9.  Rep. John Murtha.

    10. Rep. Charles Rangel.

   The uncomfortable details on each of these individuals are very long — too much for us here.  But you are invited to get in touch with the Judicial Watch organization for all the information.  Check it out for yourself.  I did.

   Oh, and possibly it should also be noted that the vast majority on the list just happen to be Democrats.  Just a coincidence, of course.

==========================

   On the educational front, a California bill to teach "gay" history was passed into law.  The rest of American history remains at its usual deficient level.

   And USA Today reports from Georgia that, "Special state investigators have uncovered a decade of organized, systematic cheating in the Atlantic School District by scores of educators, including 38 principals, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports."

   And WSJ reports, "The results of the latest National Assessment of Educational Progress, commonly known as the Nation’s Report Card, revealed that U.S. students were making little progress in their understanding of geography and how people change, and are changed by their natural environment."

   They might have considered adding how the kids are changed by the unnatural environment of today’s "liberal" learning environment.  Growing numbers of folks are beginning to wonder if that might be one of the reasons why our educational systems are failing us.

   How did such an environment come about?  Dinesh D’Souza observed (at the University of Texas Law School):  "There’s something in the liberal temperament that attracts liberals to academia.  Intelligent conservatives do other things."  That’s right.  They tend to build a country, not teach an agenda.

   Something to think about?

==========================

   Other things for the Ayatollahs of academia to think about: As reported in WSJ — "Evidence from Florida and Texas, where preferences were temporarily abolished by court order, confirms that Asian-Americans are systematically kept out of college in favor of less qualified applicants benefitting from government-sanctioned racial discrimination."

   And, we read about several hundred teachers in Washington DC schools who were finally dismissed for poor performance.  And the paper also tells us, "As more students question rising college costs, professors defend useless research and their lack of teaching."

   And the problems go on and on.  It is now being suggested that such levels of turmoil and failure will continue until fundamental changes are made in how teachers learn to teach and learn why they have no right to indoctrinate their captive audience.  Lots of luck on that one.

==========================

   It would seem that in just about every area of endeavor that they can get involved with, Holder and his Justice Department are hell-bent to block the function of justice in America.  This is also now true with regard to the botched gun-smuggling probe as well.

   As reported in The Washington Times, "The Justice Department blocked senior ATF leaders from cooperating with Congress in its investigation of the ‘Fast and Furious’ weapons operation, ordering them not to respond to questions and taking full control of replying to briefing and document requests, the agency’s top boss (Kenneth E. Melson) told congressional investigators."

   With this, added to all the rest, wouldn’t it seem that Eric Holder is involved with what so many are now saying is criminal behavior?  Is nothing to be done about this?

   From the little bit that has been learned, it would seem they are unable to account for more than 1,000 firearms.  That’s what a new congressional report shows.  Is this the way things are going to be?

==========================

   In other areas — in areas of security and defense, we find (courtesy of The Washington Times):  "A forthcoming study by the Pentagon’s Defense Science Board concludes that an Obama administration plan to shoot down long-range Iranian missiles shortly after launch will not work.  Portions of the classified study were disclosed recently during a hearing of the Senate Appropriations defense sub-committee by Sen. Richard C. Shelby."

   It would seem the Administration is equally adept in many other areas as well, including (as noted by the same publication):  "Top-secret government clearance checks were falsified. ... Overall, court records reviewed by The Washington Times show at least 170 confirmed falsifications of interviews or record checks and more than 1,000 others that couldn’t be verified.  The background investigators, whose work helps determine who gets top-secret security clearance, were submitting forms saying they conducted interviews or verified official documents when they never did."

   Oh, but our security is hard at work, right?  As reported by Bob Unruh through WND, "The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has begun watching a blog posted by a Christian who was forced to flee Brazil because of the conflict between that nation’s pro-homosexual ... agenda and his advocacy for traditional marriage.

   You might also find this American Enterprise Institute report to be of interest:  "The United States military, which has acted as the world’s security team for decades, is destined to become a ‘hollow force’ with fewer personnel and weapons systems, slowed modernization and reduced readiness under President Obama’s strategy, an analysis is predicting, according to a report from Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin."

   So goes the crumbling American empire in its latter days.

==========================

   The WSJ headlines from the Middle East (otherwise known as the "Muddled East"):  "Iran Funnels New Weapons To Iraq and Afghanistan,"  "U.S. Halts Some Aid To Pakistan For Military,"  "U.S. Recognizes Libyan Rebel Group,"  "Syrian Protesters Attacked,"  "China Reports Clash in Muslim Area,"  "Syria Warns Diplomats Not to Leave Damascus," and "U.S. Sees Iranian, al Qaeda Alliance."

   My God.  I certainly hope that last headline is a complete error.  But is seems like it may not be.

==========================

   Israel Today magazine says, "U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced the Obama administration’s desire to reestablish ties with Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood.  The Brotherhood responded by thanking Clinton, and issuing its first demand of its new American friends: drop support for the ‘Zionist regime.’ "

   Another interesting article, this time from The Washington Times, includes the following revelation: "Much of Iran’s (atomic) program, including the design of its uranium hexaflouride facility and the reactor used in its Arak heavy water facility to produce plutonium, can be traced to cooperation in the 1990s with China and Russia."

   The deceptions and the dangers are never ending.

==========================

   You may be aware, not so long ago, when we revealed the major push, much of it funded by Soros, to get Fox in any way that they could manage to do it. Well, it’s been happening, just as we predicted.

   You’ve been hearing the disparaging remarks from the left-wing media.  And, as WND reports, "Despite public statements that Fox News, which often has reported criticisms of President Obama, was granted the same access as other networks, the emails Judicial Watch obtained ‘provided evidence that FNC was specifically singled out for exclusion.’ "

   One such email, from Jennifer Psoki, the White House Communications Director, went so far as to say, "We’ve demonstrated our willingness and ability to exclude Fox News."

   And, as reported by The Law Enforcement Examiner, "Documents obtained from the Obama Treasury Department reveal that the Obama administration — contrary to its repeated denials — attempted to exclude the top-rated Fox News Channel (FNC) reporter or news anchors from having access to Treasury’s ‘Executive Pay Czar’ Kenneth Feinberg during his availability for a series of interviews with broadcast news organizations."

   In other areas of the attack, agenda-driven investigators fanned out all over the world, looking for any mistake that anyone might have ever made in that rather large organization that Fox is a part of.  Of course, with human imperfection what it is, they knew that eventually they would find someone or something that wasn’t always operating as things should be.

   They finally found there had been outsiders hired to intercept cell phone voice-mails of various news-makers.  Needless to say the Chairman and Chief Executive Rupert Murdock was not at all happy about what had been done and went after the culprits full-tilt.

   His News Corporation, which owns Fox News, also owns The News of The World in the UK where the breach in proper procedure had occurred.  The left smelled blood and went after him and his company in a big way.

   Finally, not at all happy with what he found, Murdock closed the paper down, permanently.  It once was the world’s largest newspaper.  Now it is no more.

   But the left is still out there, pushing with all it’s might.  They’ll take any opportunity they can find to run the News Corp. and Fox into the ground if they can — as they tried to do when Rupert Murdock testified before a parliamentary committee and was attacked by someone who sprung from the audience and tried to splatter him with some sort of foam-like substance.

   With all of this, one wonders how there never was the generation of a similar push against the Manchester Guardian or The New York Times when they used material from an outside source (WikiLeaks) that put a number of people at risk for their lives. Interesting thought, yes?

==========================

   As The Blaze reveals, "DEADLINE is reporting that Robert Redford and Shia LaBeouf have been cast to star in the political thriller ‘The Company You Keep,’ based on the Neil Gordon novel about the domestic terrorist group called the Weather Underground."

   As The Blaze observes, "The producers may have already given a peek at the politics behind the film." The producer, Nicolas Chartier, said this about the movie:  "This is an edge-of-your-seat thriller about real Americans who stood for their beliefs, thinking they were patriots and defending their country’s ideals against their government."

   Real Americans who stood for their beliefs?  I thought they were making bombs, setting them off in public locations and putting the lives of many innocent people in serious jeopardy.

   Defending their country’s ideals?  Is that the new definition of a terrorist?  It would seem that left-wing Redford and his Hollywood buddies are planning on giving that part of history a makeover — a real whitewashing.

   Does he think it could help Obama to offer a different background for some of the questionable friends of his past?  I don’t know, but they’re at it again, for whatever reason — rewriting history as best they can.

==========================

   This was the month when yet another deranged killer went on the rampage.  Anders Behring Breivik set off bombs and conducted a mass shooting that killed at least 76 fellow Norwegians in his native land. And almost immediately, voices on the left were raised in unison.  "It must be part of a right-wing plot!"

   And, by the end of this month we hear about yet another incident, this time of great violence and death that was stopped before it could happen.

   As reported by The Wall Street Journal: "Police in Killeen, Texas have arrested an AWOL soldier they believe was planning to attack military personnel from Fort Hood, the U.S. Army base where an army psychiatrist went on a rampage in 2009.

   "Pfc. Naser Jason Abdo, a 21-year-old infantryman who was facing a court martial at Fort Campbell, Ky., was arrested at a motel..."  This time the left was relatively quiet due to his suspected connection to Arab and Islamic interests.

   But most of the time you can count on the liberal elements to go crazy with just about anything else that happens like this, if they think they might use it to tar the right.  It’s what they do.

   It’s what we hear from the left almost anywhere and everywhere in the world when something like this happens.  And then it’s most often discovered that the vast majority of such incidents are the work of someone on the left, or by someone who hates indiscriminately and/or has no strong political connection in any single direction.

   But the left never lets a little thing like an inconvenient truth get in their way.

==========================

   This writer will never understand why the left-media in America never seems to understand what their "applied agenda" does to them and what it will really take to up their rating.  Changing talking heads or apologizing for irresponsible behavior isn’t the final answer.

   There is but one thing I know that will improve their lot with regard to audience numbers — just one thing. All they need to do is offer a full and balanced presentation with an emphasis on truth.  That’s all it takes.

   The latest thrashing about for any other possible answer includes cutting Eliot Spitzer from the main CNN evening lineup.  Other changes are happening there as well but nobody is seeing what is really needed.

   On Comedy Central, Jon Stewart apologized after some very imprudent remarks about Fox News viewers.  Again, nobody is actually seeing what is really needed.  Let’s face it, the viewers have voted with their remotes and these guys still don’t seem to have a clue.

   So be it.

==========================

   The union-enabled Obama administration has created a monster.  Unions and their thugs are encouraged as never before to take over just about everything they can get their hands on and silence that which they cannot.  The Wall Street Journal has been chronicling their march to unprecedented power.

   As documented by Andrew J. Cowin, "Late last month, the Connecticut think tank of which I am chairman was the subject of a bizarre complaint filed by public-union leaders.  Their gripe?  That the Yankee Institute is critical of union practices and that our founders share the same view.

   Who will be next, The Wall Street Journal, my web site, and other efforts to communicate the truth?  And it’s even reaching for the skies above us.  As additionally reported by WSJ, "Americans may be wondering what this week’s partial shutdown of the Federal Aviation Administration is all about, given that it doesn’t have anything to do with the debt ceiling.

   As further noted, "Labor organizations in those industries used to have to persuade a majority of employees to form an union, a standard that prevailed since 1934.  But in 2010, the National Mediation Board that governs these elections suddenly changed the rules.

   The end result of all of this has ended up giving a partial shutdown at the FAA and who knows how many more problems yet to come.  It has been further noted that, "The FAA bill the House passed earlier this year would have undone the mediation board’s about-face, but Democrats killed the provision in the Senate."

   And, "The House passed another stopgap — the 21st — to prevent an FAA shutdown through September, with the labor imbroglio still unresolved.  Senate Democrats rejected it."

   Of course somehow all of this will be presented as somebody else’s fault in the left-slanted media.  Of course.

   And finally, The National Right To Work Legal Defense Foundation asks in an open letter: "As long as union bosses enjoy the special legal privilege to seize dues from workers as a condition of employment, shouldn’t workers at least know where the money is going?  Not if you ask Big Labor and the Obama administration.

   Do we see a pattern here with all of this?

==========================

   Land of the free?  If you’ve been following our accounting, you have seen how little is left right now and how endangered the remainder has become. Now let’s continue to expose this decline.

   As The Washington Times details, "When Mike and Chantell Sackett bought a half-acre lot in the Priest Lake area of Idaho’s Panhandle, their plan was to build a home in which they could raise a family.

   "Four years later, there’s still no house on the lot. What the Sacketts have built instead is a high-stakes legal challenge against the Environmental Protection Agency over its enforcement of the Clean Water Act.

   Their efforts were useless.  And what on earth is all this "wetlands" business about?  This writer has seen a good picture of the lot and its surrounding area.  It’s elevated, barren, and totally different from any sort of "wetlands."  The government, as usual, is making no sense whatsoever.

   And the examples of this sort of thing keep multiplying — endlessly.

==========================

   Other examples of our growing oppression can be seen in increasing numbers of towns across the nation. A sampling, by Jon Christian Ryter, includes the following:

   "The City Council of Gould, Arkansas recently enacted an ordinance that forbids residents of the city from meeting and organizing groups without approval of the city council.  Abrogating citizen rights in cities with liberals in charge of the governments appears to be growing."

   Another Ryter example: "In June, 2011, Cedar Rapids, Iowa enacted Ordinance 2740 that violates the 4th Amendment.  The ordinance forces all commercial property owners to put lock boxes (which can be easily broken open) on their business establishments that will give city officials unfettered access to those businesses 24-7."

   We could list a dozen more like these examples.  But I’m sure you are getting the picture.

   So, what does all this mean?  It would most certainly suggest that our original constitutional form of government is in serious jeopardy.

   Not surprising, a Time magazine cover and associated story featured a shredding U.S. Constitution this month, along with the question that asks if this historic document still matters.

   As The Daily Caller reported, "On MSNBC, ‘Morning Joe,’ Time magazine editor Richard Stengel presented the cover of his July 4 issue, which features the U.S. Constitution going through a paper shredder and asks if the document still matters.  According to Stengel, it does, but not as much anymore."

   So it would seem.

==========================

   The destruction of our founding documents and the freedoms that they represent are not events limited to this particular time in our history.  The inclination of some individuals and groups to undue the best of any period in any nation’s history has always been there, like a dark cloud in an otherwise blue sky.  It’s an ever-active example of a very unfortunate human failing.

   This has been true for America as well.  And, as with so many other civilizations, there will almost always come a time when the darker forces among us gain far too much ground and create considerable havoc with all that we love.  Unfortunately for us all, we are living in such a time.

   By way of example, in 2005 The Supreme Court officially sanctioned the rather extensive property theft that had been growing throughout our nation for some time.  It’s that infamous use of eminent domain to force the sale of private property to other private interests that local governments feel might generate a greater tax revenue.

   It flies against one of the most basic cornerstones of our Constitutional freedoms.  And this loss has not gone unnoticed.  Folks have risen up against this blasphemy and states have passed laws to protect property owners from these obvious abuses of eminent domain.

   It is mentioned here and now because it is a battle being waged right now, along with so many other battles to try and regain what has been lost — what we find on that growing list of forfeited freedoms.

   Something to think about.

==========================

   You thought that ACORN (an old haunt of our President Obama) had been cracked open and put out of its misery — or maybe I should say out of our misery, right?  Not in this life.

   The investigative reporting by Judicial Watch has revealed, "ACORN employees have been nailed, and time and again, for fraudulently registering voters — including Mickey Mouse and the Dallas Cowboys football team — allegedly for the purpose of sweeping Democrats into office.

   The revelation continues:  "So why is ACORN still receiving taxpayer dollars in defiance of the funding ban?"  As revealed, "Judicial Watch investigators recently discovered that the Obama Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] has issued a $79,819 grant to the Affordable Housing Centers of America — an offshoot of ACORN — in apparent violation of the ACORN funding ban passed by Congress and signed into law."

   Is anybody ever going to be seriously held responsible for this?  Of course not.

==========================

   There’s been a lot of talk this month about raising taxes — at least from the Obama side of the debate. So possibly we might want to take a look and see just how many taxes we have to deal with these days.

   Let me see, to name a few, there is an Accounts Receivable Tax, a Building Permit Tax, a CDL license Tax, a Cigarette Tax, a Corporate Income Tax, a Dog License Tax, a Federal Income Tax, a Federal Unemployment Tax, a Fishing License Tax, a Food License Tax, a Fuel Permit Tax, a Gasoline Tax, and an Inventory Tax.

   Is that enough for you?  No?  Well then, how about an IRS Interest Penalty Tax, a Liquor Tax, a Marriage License Tax, a Medicare Tax, a Property Tax, a Service Charge Tax, a Social Security Tax, a Sales Tax, a Recreational Vehicle Tax, a School Tax, a State Income Tax, a State Unemployment Tax, and a Telephone Federal Excise Tax.

 Does that do it for you?  If not, then also consider a Telephone Federal and State and Local Surcharge Tax, a Utilities Tax, a Vehicle License Registration Tax, and a Workers Compensation Tax.

   Shall I go on?  I’d rather not.  By now just about everybody knows what sort of oppression this represents.  One last thought, however — did you know that a hundred years ago not a single one of these taxes existed and somehow we managed to be the most prosperous nation on earth?  I wonder why?

==========================

   Of the latest news related to the Internet there is the growing awareness that online learning is gaining everywhere.  This means fewer teachers needed per student, which means less power for the teachers union and lower cost for the student.

   On another matter, with Al Gore still trying to impress people wherever he can, perhaps we should remind folks of a bit of history.  You may recall that Mr. Gore had claimed many things, including that he had invented the Internet.  This statement of his received plenty of press, as you may remember.

   We would like to quote this relevant information from Newsmax magazine:  "The Internet came into being because of the genius work of Dr. Robert E. Kahn and Dr. Vinton G. Cerf.

   These men, while working for the Department of Defense in the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in the early 1970s, conceived, designed, and implemented the idea of ‘open-architecture networking.’ This breakthrough in connectivity gave birth to the Internet."  An inconvenient truth for Mr. Gore and his star-eyed supporters.

   It might also be mentioned that this writer was a part of early computing and was personally aware of this information and Mr. Gore’s boldface lie.  Just thought you’d like to know.

   And on yet another matter, as reported by WorldNetDaily, "An elite team of computer technicians, assembled by the Obama administration to protect Pentagon networkers from cyberattack, shockingly includes a former Clinton official who ‘lost’ thousands of archived emails under subpoena and who more recently left the Department of Homeland Security under an ethical cloud related to her qualifications."  Her name is Laura Callahan.

   Here we go again.

Still A Long Way To Go

   August, 2011.  So, now we have a debt ceiling deal. It most certainly is not what most Americans wanted (as we all have learned), because it raises the debt ceiling once again, and it offers very little in the way of much needed financial reform (as we all have also heard).  And now even a number of the more apologetic economists are admitting that the "...deal is seen as mild drag on economy." (WSJ)

   And others, like Congressman Paul Ryan (Chairman of the House Budget Committee) is asking, "Where’s your budget, Mr. President?"  And he further adds (as reported in the Wall Street Journal) that "Democrats have abandoned credible spending plans."

   And, in The Washington Times, Michelle Malkin tells us "...it’s back to big government spending as usual," as she notes that, "The American age of austerity lasted approximately three minutes, give or take a nanosecond. Immediately after the Senate approved the bipartisan ‘Budget Control Act of 2011' on August 2, President Obama hustled over to the Rose Garden to crow about the renewed opportunity to make ‘key investments.’ "  Nobody has any doubt as to what that means.

   Other activities, as detailed in The Wall Street Journal by Nick Timiraos, includes the disturbing news that, "The Obama administration will announce plans to seek investors’ ideas for turning thousands of foreclosed properties owned by government-backed entities into rental homes, according to administration officials."

   Sound like a good idea?  And what might we expect to happen with such properties being off the market in the already severely depressed real estate area of our economy?

   In other areas of governmental interference we find such things as subsidized housing (under Section-8 rental subsidies) causing noticeable harm to formerly stable neighborhoods.  And now, under Obama, the situation has plummeted into chaos.

   That’s what we find after a four-year investigation by a number of reporting agencies, including the Indianapolis Housing Authority, the Chicago Housing Authority, the Northern Illinois University Center for Governmental Studies, federal Housing and Urban Development report, and an endless number of other agencies and reports.

   And what are they telling us? — That the areas involved with such subsidized housing are almost always involved with extensive increases in crime. And it’s destroying the property values and it’s destroying lives and it’s costing us all a fortune.  Well, of course.  What else would you have expected?

   Want to know how Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac played their roll in this endless mess?  We recommend the book, "Reckless Endangerment" by Gretchen Morgenson and Joshua Rosner.  It’s truly an eye-opener of epic proportions.

   And how have those bank bailouts been working? As Holman W. Jenkins, Jr. reports in the WSJ Business World, "Banks like Bank of America are creatures of the safety net.  They wouldn’t exist without it. ... After the Countrywide deal began to sour, according to an FCIC investigator, a B of A official even reproached the Fed for approving the deal and then not doing more to support it with regulatory favors."

   The bailouts and favors already given were not enough?  I guess not.

==========================

   As we move along, we see that Exxon has made a truly gigantic oil discovery in the Gulf of Mexico.  So what’s happened?  Our federal government has taken the action to delay or possibly deny the exploitation rights. Naturally — we can’t have us becoming independent from Arab oil, now can we?

   This month also sees the Obama Labor Board backing the unions in every way possible, even with requirements that will force businesses to put up union posters.  The dictatorship is firming up.

   And then there’s that San Francisco Chinatown subway project (at $1.6 billion for just 1.7 miles).  As the WSJ put it, "The subway is a case study in government incompetence and wasted taxpayer money."  You were expecting something else?

   The problem seems universal.  All over the nation we can see this sort of financial irresponsibility.  You can go all the way to Central Fall, Rhode Island where the city has had to file for bankruptcy, or go back out to California again and you find that the state’s lack of proper funding has jammed up the state courts.

   You can also go into orbit and find that because Obama has ended our shuttle program (along with just about everything else) the International Space Station may have to be terminated.  That’s what they’re talking about now.

   Isn’t that nice?  We’ve done such a good job of mucking everything up, haven’t we?

   So how is our tainted financial pedigree doing now? Not so well, it would seem.  As Reuters reports "A downgrade of United States’ top-tier credit rating has Wall Street scrambling to figure out the knock-out effects for the financial system, from mortgages to banks to markets that rely on U.S. Treasuries for collateral."

   And near the beginning of the month, Standard & Poor’s managing director John Chambers said, "There is a 1-in-3 chance of a further U.S. credit rating downgrade over the next six months to two years."

   And Karl Rove reports on Fox News that the percentage of GDP that represents our public debt was 40% at the beginning of 2009, 62% by 2010 and now is 72% in 2011.  Remember, those figures are not just a bunch of random numbers, they represent the real world — like it or not.

   Want to know what else has been going on?  As reported in The Wall Street Journal, "An employee at the Securities and Exchange Commission has accused the regulatory agency of destroying at least 9,000 documents relating to inquiries of Wall Street banks and hedge funds."

   And, as Paul Krugman reports, an "Audit of the Federal Reserve reveals $16 trillion in secret bailouts." And as the days go by the mess just doesn’t get any better.

==========================

   Well, with all the other nonsense going on, we’re still going to apply a reasonable amount of austerity to government operations, right?  Wrong!  The facts and figures show us that spending on the federal level is expected to actually reach a record high this year.

   Why is that so and how can we change this situations? William Lajeunesse, Fox News and The Patriot Action Network all posted the following: "With America still drowning in debt, critics in and outside of Congress say it’s time to reassess U.S. foreign aid — especially to China.

 No.  You think?  In fact, why are we the nation giving foreign aid to anyone at this time? — a time when we are so much in need and so deeply in debt.

   Conservative Byte reflected the public sentiment that, "President Obama said the U.S. lost its AAA credit rating because analysts ‘doubted our political system’s ability to act,’ "  And who’s political ability do you think it is that cannot respond appropriately?

   We all recall how Obama took no advice from his own deficit commission (and now we have a "super committee" to do the whole thing all over again).  And, of course, Obama lurches forward with endless new restrictions, bureaucratic detailing, and other impediments to our recovery, which even include a new Dept. of Transportation proposal that all of our farmers must now acquire commercial drivers licenses in order to continue functioning.

   As if the myriad of restrictions and misdirections weren’t enough now Obama’s Justice Department is joining hands with the SEC to investigate Standard & Poor’s for daring to issue its downgrade rating.

   It’s an almost unbelievable chain of events that will join so many other historic nightmares to become a part of a most shameful period of our American history.  You can be sure that future generations will long note this infamy.

==========================

   So, with all of this, what were the economic headlines for this month?  Consider the following: "Washington’s Haggling Left Wall Street Dangling; Factories Slow Pace As Orders Contract;  Stocks Nose-Dive Amid Global Fears;  Central Banks Join Rush to Gold; A Wild Ride for Financial Markets;  Markets Brace for Downgrade’s Toll."

   And it continued on with: "Downgrade Ignites a Global Selloff;  Dollar Pounded on U.S. Outlook;  Higher Food Prices on Way;  Trade Gap Widens as Exports Slide; I nflation Jump Undercuts Growth Prospects;  Economy Sinks Markets."

   And, as the month labors on: "Soft Economic Data Saps Dollar;  Forecast Clouds Debt-Cut Outlook;  Job Market Still Looks Weak;  Central Bankers Worry Economy Still in Peril;  Economy Deeply Divides Fed." We are coming to realize a most frightening scenario.

   All of these headlines, in chronological order for the month, are from The Wall Street Journal, a very dependable source for accurate information.

==========================

   What does America think about what’s been happening to our country?  Well, a Gallup Poll this month shows us that 11% are satisfied, 88% are dissatisfied and 1% have no opinion.  And a Rasmussen poll this month shows us that 14% think we’re going in the right direction and 79% believe we are going in the wrong direction.

   And from Reuters: "Economic fears are weighing heavily on Americans, with a large majority saying the United States is on the wrong track and nearly half believing the worst is yet to come, a Reuters/psos poll said."

   And in addition to the business leaders we have already quoted, we could add Howard Schultz, Starbucks CEO, with his comment, as quoted by the Bloomberg News: "I am asking that all of us forego political contributions until the Congress and the President return to Washington and deliver a fiscally disciplined long-term debt and deficit plan to the American people."

   Also, Jack A. Ablin, the CFA of the Harris Private Bank has reported that, "In an economy where spending begets profits and profits beget hiring, the train is off the rails.  Profitable firms simply aren’t hiring. Instead, corporate America is hoarding cash and using their liquidity to buy back shares, raise dividends and acquire strategic partners, none of which directly adds to payrolls.  Business owners and CEOs argue that benefit costs, most notably health care, make hiring prohibitive."

   Sorry folks.  That’s the way it is.

==========================

   The Wall Street Journal has reported that, "On his three-state tour in the Midwest this week, Mr. Obama repeatedly told audiences that the Korea, Columbia and Panama free-trade deals would all be law by now if not for an obstructionist Congress.  Passing the deals is something Congress ‘could do right now,’ he said.

   "Except that’s not true.  Congress can’t pass the agreements ‘right now’ because it doesn’t have them. They are still sitting on the President’s desk."  But what is most disturbing of all, that is only the latest in a long line of flat-out lies that Obama has been feeding us for a long, long time.

   So, what has the Administration been actually doing?  As Ann Coulter put it in the weekly Human Events newspaper, "Their plan is to keep spending, while blaming tax breaks for corporate jets for the entire $14.3 trillion deficit.  The Democrats will never suggest any cuts to a budget that has put the country another $4 trillion in debt since Obama became President."

   Miss Coulter further observes that, "...now Sen. Mitch McConnel (R-Ky.) has checkmated the Democrats.  He had proposed a bill that will allow Obama to raise the debt ceiling three times, up to $2.4 trillion, over the next 18 months, but provide that only Obama proposes equivalent cuts in spending each time.  Finally, the Democrats will be forced to pony up spending cuts or default on the debt and crash the economy."

   An interesting take.  I know we will all be wanting very much to see what happens next.

==========================

   Is there anything we can do about this madness? Perhaps.  The Washington Examiner says that "Spending, not entitlements, created the huge deficit." That most certainly does suggest that reducing the overblown size of government, to facilitate a following significant cut in spending — it would suggest such an action might be an important start in the right direction.

   Jason Clemens (in the WSJ) observed that, "While the U.S. remains mired in debt and slogs through a subpar economic recovery, Canada is moving ahead steadily. Its unemployment rate peaked at a little over 8.5% and is now 7.4% and there were no bank bailouts. Real GDP growth is expected to be roughly 3% this year."

   And he further observed, "Fiscal reforms have shrunk debt and paved the way for faster growth and less unemployment."  Wouldn’t this suggest that serious fiscal reform here in America could offer a positive impact?  There are a number of us out here in the real world who think that’s not an unreasonable assumption.

   The leadership of the Federal Reserve, the IMF and the OECD, meeting in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, generated a suggestion as well.  As reported by Reuters, "While regulatory reform since the 2007-09 financial crisis has given added clout to government regulators, the concentration of power is likely to do more harm than good unless the regulators themselves are subject to proper oversight, Brown University economist Ross Levine said in a paper presented at the Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank’s annual meeting here." — and shared with the leadership of the Jackson Hole meeting.

   Yes, responsible oversight is very important, wouldn’t you say?

   A number of news stories have been reporting that many small-business owners have made it very clear that they have a number of job openings they can’t fill. Why?  Because they haven’t been able to find the qualified people with the necessary skills.

   And that’s where it stands.  As Jane Blakemore reports in Newsmax magazine, "A staggering 6.2 million of the 13.9 million Americans officially out of work are ‘long-term unemployed,’ meaning they’ve been unable to find work for at least half a year.

   Perhaps a realistic approach to an actual solution might be to first have the government publish the more truthful figures of actual unemployment, and then move toward a comprehensive, national retraining program.

   And, since our national finances are in such God-awful shape, why not consider a big, national telethon?  Get everyone to agree that whatever is raised by public donation, it would be matched by our industrial and financial leaders and, in the same amount, by our federal government.

   It wouldn’t completely solve the problem, but it would be a great step in the right direction, don’t you think?

==========================

   It seems that the endless tax problems are truly eternal.  And we see this in just about everything that’s happening out there.

   One example, from Grassfire Nation: "The dirty debt deal ‘Super Committee’ has not even officially convened, yet these elite members are already angling to use their super-legislative powers to raise your taxes.

   Meanwhile, others are doing what they can to hawk a "value-added tax" (VAT) without telling you how they would like to implement it.  We are told they want to do it the way it was done in Europe.  That would mean an added tax structure, not a substitution for our income tax system.  That’s the word that’s going around about this scheme.

   And what is this we are hearing about HR-4646?  Isn’t that being proposed as a 1% tax on all bank transactions?  They’ve got to be kidding, right?

   Of course some folks are able and willing to strike back, as in Wheatland Township in Illinois.  As reported in the WSJ: "...those gathered in this Chicago suburb earlier this month weren’t facing off against impassive town officials.

   Interesting.  Maybe direct democracy is a concept that might be worthy of some consideration now and again.

==========================

   We have seen how many criminals manage to walk away from serious crimes — that there is no doubt in anyone’s mind they committed — often times due to judges’ bias, jury inadequacies, very poor prosecution practices, or on various technicalities.  And that doesn’t even account for the politicians and many appointed officials who seem to be above the law.

   So, now what about the innocent?  How are they treated in today’s court system?  With some of them, not so well.

   We see a federal system of asset seizure that, as noted in The Wall Street Journal, is "Netting innocent with Guilty."  And business is booming, thanks to our extremely flawed current Justice Department.

   And then there is this business of still finding so many poor souls who were jailed for many years, and some even convicted of murder, only to find DNA evidence that shows they were totally innocent.  We have so many examples of how our justice system makes victims out of innocent people, it would take a big, thick book to adequately cover only a few of the many heartbreaking stories.

   But then, you’ve heard about and read about them from time to time, haven’t you?  Now, the question is, what are you or anyone else going to do about it? What are we going to do about it?

==========================

   And then there are the lawyers — God help us. I know, there does seem to be a precious few who don’t charge an arm and a leg and try to really make a positive difference — too few to be sure.

   Two fellows wrote a book (Winston & Crandall) with a title that they suggest might be part of the solution. (Title: "First Thing We Do, Let’s Deregulate All the Lawyers").  They write that "Every industry that has been deregulated, from trucking to telephones, has lowered prices without sacrificing quality."

   However, this writer is inclined to see the organized steel grip that the legal industry has on the public, as a very clear example of a true monopoly.  You haven’t heard about that before?  I should think not.  A very large percentage of politicians are also lawyers. Almost all judges were lawyers first, as are prosecutors.  And most of our media hasn’t really ever cared that much about such issues, one way or the other.

   And the lawyers know what’s going on — they’ve got what they’ve got and you damn well better get used to it.  Most will charge all they can.  Let’s face it, you might even get justice now and again,.... if you can afford it.

   Let’s face it, the lawyers of America have a very exclusive ownership and almost total control of that most valuable commodity known as the American civil and criminal legal system.  And you can’t break it up or have any say at all, with powerful citizen reviews, oversight controls or any other "outside" process.

   Yes, it most certainly is a monopoly.  Anyone for a little antitrust action here?  Just try it and see how far you get.

==========================

   Our Justice Department, various judges, and certain federal investigating agencies seem to be working overtime these days.  This month we offer the following chapters of the endless saga:

   As Bob Unruh (WND) reports, "A federal judge who owes his lifetime appointment to Barack Obama today concluded that a pro-life organization whose leaders criticized a politician for supporting Obamacare for funding abortions just might be guilty of defamation — and possibly be worthy of jail time.

   "The ruling comes from Judge Timothy S. Black in Cincinnati, who refused to dismiss a case brought by former Democratic U.S. Rep. Steve Driehaus against the Susan B. Anthony List organization which had criticized the congressman’s vote for Obamacare."  How can this happen and who will they be going after next?

   The Justice Department (under Eric Holder) continues its journey into anarchy, this time as reported by Fox News.  "The Justice Department has filed a lawsuit against Alabama’s new controversial immigration law, essentially fighting Alabama on grounds similar to its legal battle with Arizona over that state’s controversial law.

   "In both cases, the Justice Department argues that the states are overstepping their authority by wading into something that is a strictly federal responsibility: Immigration enforcement."  But what does a state do when the federal authority limits, and in some cases, abandons its responsibility in such areas?

   Does not then the responsibility fall on the states, since protection and enforcement of the law are primary responsibilities that must not be allowed to be seriously diminished?

   As you no doubt realize, the FBI is under the Justice Department, and the Justice Department is headed by Eric Holder who, we observe, takes his orders from Obama.  So one should not be too surprised to find, "...the FBI and other agencies are asking managers of surplus stores to spy on their customers, watching whether they pay in cash, make ‘extreme’ religious statements or purchase products such as waterproof matches." (General news report and blog.)

   Unbelievable?  No, it’s just "big brother" watching you.

   And I would imagine you have followed the Congressional hearing about the gun-running fiasco that went so terribly wrong.  Among other things, Eric Holder testified that he had "...heard about it over the last few weeks."

   This runs counter to Holder having bragged about such operations at a special meeting in Mexico City some time ago, and the revelation that the White House had been fully informed in September of 2010.  It would seem that Mr. Holder has once again been found to be lying under oath during official testimony. So it would seem.

   Human Events did an extensive cover story this month on Eric Holder.  The title was: "Enemy of The State."  It was very serious and very detailed.  Let’s hope you are not missing such exposés.

   The question is, what can be done about this.

==========================

   Remember when Obama said we’ve all got to behave in a more civil manner?  That has certainly become the signature joke of the new Democratic political campaign.  And there are so many examples of this new civility.  A few are as follows:

   "Vice President Joe Biden joined Democrats in lashing ‘tea party Republicans,’ accusing them of having ‘acted like terrorists’ in the fight over raising the nation’s debt limit, according to several sources in the room.

   "Biden was agreeing with a line of argument made by Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.) at a two-hour, closed-door Democratic Caucus meeting.  ‘We have negotiated with terrorists,’ an angry Doyle said, according to sources in the room." (From: Politico)

   And black Democratic Congressman Andre Carson checked in with his rant: "Some of them in Congress right now of this Tea Party movement would love to see you and me hanging on a tree."

   And a number of independent pundits have noted, when Obama and his people (the liberal/progressive element) feel that someone or some group is found to be supporting one or more possible solutions that they decide not to approve of, then it seems they are most often inclined to automatically announce that such individuals or groups are the responsible parties for the original problem.

   And, it might be added, getting them to realize the very serious, irresponsible nature of this behavior is not unlike trying to get a drug addict to admit that he has a problem.

   Another example of illogical and irresponsible reaction would be when Obama wanted to set up the date of his next campaign speech — before Congress. As reported by the Associated Press: "House Speaker John Boehner is asking President Barack Obama to give his major speech on jobs to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 8 instead of Sept. 7 as requested by the president."

   Of course Obama wanted it on Sept. 7, the same day and close to the exact time that the next Republican Presidential Debate was scheduled.  So, when the change to the following day was suggested, a number of Democrats had a little sissy-fit.

   What they didn’t want you to realize was what was further reported by AP: "Boehner pointed out (in his reply) that a request requires House and Senate approval and that the House was not scheduled to return to session until Sept. 7."

   Obama either already knew that and didn’t care or neither he nor his staff understood the time factor in such scheduling.  Either way, it certainly seems like just one more ignorant attempt to do whatever they want to do.  Take your pick.

==========================

   It’s been quite a revelation, especially for various behavioral scientists, observing the stark differences between the speechmaker-Obama and the administrator-Obama.

   We see the likable personality, sometimes referred to as that of a "snake-oil salesman," when the programing of his speechwriters and his Teleprompters are in play.  And, to avoid the usual slips, gaffs and general uncertainties without such supports, these crutches are almost always in place now.

   A good example of the extent of such programing would be with the Patriot Action Network’s observation that, "President Obama required two heavy-duty Teleprompters during a three-minute speech in which he nominated Alan Krueger to serve as chairman of his Council of Economic Advisers."

   Bret Stephens wrote a thoughtful piece in The Wall Street Journal which explored the presidential "limitations" in several areas.  The work involves disturbing but accurate observations.

   He quoted Obama, showing his notable ego, when the president said, "I think I’m a better speech writer than my speech writers."  And, "I know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors.  And I’ll tell you right now that I’m ... a better political director than my political director."

   Mr. Stephens then observed that, "Socrates taught that wisdom begins in the recognition of how little we know."  That’s a thought that we have come to realize would be totally lost on Mr. Obama.

   And, as further observed, "He makes predictions that prove false.  He makes promised he cannot honor.  He raises expectations he cannot meet. ... He is absent from issues in which he has a duty to be involved."

   The final conclusion in the detailed essay was just about the only one that could be imagined.  It all seems to come down to, "A case study in stupid is as stupid does."

   One of the many, many things that Obama seems not to have a clue about is the Constitutionally defined division of responsibility in our federal government. (Or, maybe he does understand and just wants to change it?)

   It’s simple really.  Congress is the division of our government that is charged with the responsibility of passing laws.  That does not mean our Presidency issuing executive orders or having various department ruling made that are intended to stand as the equivalent of laws that were not intended or passed by the Congress.

   To do otherwise is to break the law!  And we know what has happened concerning this, don’t we?

   On labor issues, Obama and his cohorts move forward as well — and more aggressively than ever. As Eugene Scalia, a former solicitor of labor, wrote in The Wall Street Journal on the latest package, "...a proposal of the National Labor Relations Board to enable unions to force organizing elections with as little as 10 days’ notice.

   "Critical issues governing the election — such as which employees may vote — would be determined in a hearing just a week after the union petitions for a vote." After a full, critical analysis, Mr. Scalia concludes that, "A union election is a decisive event in an employee’s life, and the new rules limit the information employees can get before voting."

   When one looks at the larger pattern of all that has been happening, one cannot escape the obvious.  If all of these things continue, America can only be destined to discontinue.

==========================

   We never seem to take the books of dictatorial ideologues very seriously.  Even Hitler’s book was not considered to be consequential, until it was too late. So, let us look at the two books of a current ideologue and see what we find.

   In Obama’s book, "Audacity of Hope," he writes of his attitude toward whites.  He says he harbors a "...coil of rage."  And he also wrote, "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."

   And from Obama’s book, "Dreams From My Father," he wrote, "I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."  And in the same book he also wrote, "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race."

   Can’t we ever learn from these people?  Will Democrats, and others, eternally reside in the fantasyland of denial?  Is there no way that we can guide them back into the world of reality?

   I know, the real world can be exceptionally uncomfortable at times.  I know that it is often very hard to realize that one might have made a most serious error in judgement.  Might it feel not quite so bad for them if they were to realize that some of the greatest conservatives in America were once liberals? Yes, including Ronald Reagan.

   But they found sweet reason and emerged into the daylight of what is — not some false dream of what never was.  These are some of the thoughts of this writer.  What are your thoughts?

==========================

   The "left" (which is now in charge) has left a long and infamous legacy of lie after lie, after lie.  It seems to be the only way they can function.

   Remember when Senator John Kerry was trying to impress us with his war experience with his great Cambodian gunboat war stories?  Witnesses finally came forward and we learned he was lying.

   Remember when Al Gore told us about his sister’s lung cancer death and about his invention of the Internet?  Subsequent investigation showed us he was lying on both counts.

   Remember when Bill Clinton said, "I have vivid and painful memories of black churches being burned in my own state when I was a child."  Historic records tell us he was lying.

   And remember when Obama tried to show us how his Obamacare was so necessary with the personal tale that, "I will never forget watching my own mother ... worrying about whether her insurer would claim her illness was a pre-existing condition."  We found that to be a lie as well.  (Thanks, Dr. Milton R. Wolf and The Washington Times for these interesting examples.)

   Speaking of Obama, he seems to have outdone them all. As Human Events shows us, "During the debate over raising the debt ceiling, President Obama said that 80% of Americans support including higher taxes as part of the deal.  But a Rasmussen poll taken the same week showed that only 34% believed a tax hike should be included in a debt-ceiling agreement."

   And, additionally, "Obama pledged during his campaign and throughout his presidency not to raise taxes on families making less than $250,000.  But Obamacare’s individual mandate will hit many under the $250,000 mark."

   And, "When Obama was selling his $787 billion stimulus package, he consistently bragged about how shovel-ready construction jobs would be funded across the nation.  Even the President later admitted that was a lie, as he told the New York Times: ‘There’s no such thing as shovel-ready projects.’ "

   And, "During the 2008 presidential campaign, Obama said: ‘We have the chance to tell all those corporate lobbyists that the days of them setting the agenda in Washington are over. ... I don’t take a dime of their money, and when I am President, they won’t find a job in my White House.’  At least a dozen former lobbyists got top jobs in his administration at the beginning of his presidency, according to Politico, and National Public Radio reported the Obama administration was granting waivers to lobbyists to circumvent the ban."

   And, "During the battle over Arizona’s immigration law, President Obama said: ‘Now suddenly if you don’t have your papers and you took your kid out to get ice cream, you can be harassed, that’s something that could potentially happen.’

   And on and on the examples go.  The dishonesty is not only massive, it is catastrophic.  Why do I say that? Because if we can no longer trust our government leadership we are lost.

   Thank God so much of this is now coming to light. But can enough people be reached and will they pay attention?  Time will tell.

==========================

   Now let’s look at this month’s Obama security picture.  According to Conservative Byte, "Infiltration of the federal government by members of the radical Muslim Brotherhood is worse than some have warned recently, says a former FBI special agent in Washington.

   And The Washington Times informs us that, "A Pentagon program to rush 21 helicopters to Afghan military forces in time for this summer’s fighting season was derailed by the Obama administration’s conciliatory policy toward Russia ..."

   And then the Daily Telegraph (UK) tells us that, "Secret talks between the United States and the Taliban leadership have broken down after details of the negotiations were leaked."

   And finally, an Atlas Shrugs posting reveals that, "The White House’s published guest list for this year’s Ramadan Iftar dinner was much shorter than the previous years’ roster.  It excluded the names of several controversial advocates who have attended the event in the past, including some who The Daily Caller can confirm did attend."

   So much for the direction and control of our nation — right at the top.

==========================

   If you’ve been seriously reading this rather detailed chronology of Obamanations, you know this president’s specific directions, as seen through his actual choices and actions, and by those he has brought into his administration and has otherwise taken on as allies.

   It should be no surprise that now the Communist Party USA has officially endorsed the reelection of Barack Obama.  And, what is most important in this is not that he got such an endorsement, but why he got it.

   And that is where a serious examination of the past and current history of this Obama saga gives you all that you will ever need to know to get a genuine understanding of this.  Please do take this very seriously and share this understanding with everyone you know.

   Just remember, it may be a terrible time in our history, but it is something that we can and must overcome.  Unborn generations will be counting on you.  The future of America is in your hands.

==========================

   In almost every area, in most endeavors, the decomposition of our nation continues.  We have shown an endless parade of examples, even as new examples keep emerging.  And, as it all continues, we see (as reported in The Washington Times by Stephen Divan): "Bowing to pressure from pro-immigration forces, the Obama administration said ... it will halt deportation proceedings on a case-by-case basis against illegal aliens who meet certain criteria..."

   Now that is what is actually happening. And what it really means is another Obama move around our Congress to begin the process of amnesty for illegal aliens, who have broken into our nation illegally, who have broken the law by so doing, and, in some instances, have stolen identities, and in some cases have committed far more serious crimes.

   I know, that’s not what the advocates say is happening.  But all too often, that is what we find has actually happened.

   And with this, and all the other problems we are facing, what are we to do?  Well, as revealed by World Net Daily (WND), "Judicial Watch has filed a lawsuit over the federal government’s refusal to disclose how much taxpayers spent to send Michelle Obama on a ‘family outing’ that included a safari in Africa."

   And, in another area of concern, "A federal judge has ordered the Secret Service to release eight months of White House visitor logs it had previously kept hidden — an estimated ‘tens of thousands’ of records from Obama’s first year in office."

   And, as Newsmax magazine reports, there are others who are committed and involved with these necessary scandalous exposures. "Virginia activist Attorney General, Ken Cuccinelli, battles to restrain the federal government and keep a wary eye on the ‘schoolyard bully across the Potomac.’ "

   And there are other individuals and groups fighting back.  They’re out there, but there are never enough of them.  So many others, who believe as they do, have got to understand that they must have the courage to step up and become involved.  That’s the plea that we are hearing out there.

==========================

   Chicanery and the other frauds of politics are having their day — a field day.  And the revelations continue unabated.

   As Jerome R. Corsi (WND) has revealed, "The ‘buffer zone’ parcel at the Obama family mansion in Chicago’s upscale Kenwood neighborhood, purchased by the wife of convicted felon Tony Rezko, was transferred to Barack and Michelle Obama without ever being assessed or taxed, in apparent violation of Illinois law, according to a debt-collection expert.

   And, as the Patriot Action Network told us about Obama’s new political campaign bus, "The U.S. leader swept onto the campaign trail with a sleek and even sinister looking set of wheels with blacked-out windows, worth $1.1 million.

   Well, Sarah Roman’s description of the giant bus as "sinister" can well describe this item when you realize that you and I — the taxpayers — paid for that monstrosity which, by the way, for the most part was built in Canada, not here in America.

   We are told, that’s the Chicago way.  Maybe so or maybe not — but it definitely isn’t the American way.

==========================

   This writer is only one of many who have come to recognize the serious level of corruption that has infested our nation.  And, although it has reached into the stratosphere under the current administration, Republicans are not found to be immune from the problem.  It’s an embarrassing human weakness (one of many) that can worm its way into almost any political ideology.

   So now, at this time, we are finding hearings on the issue in the House and a bill that’s intended to deal with corruption that has actually passed a Senate committee.  Who knows, maybe sometime this century, we may see some significant progress finally emerge.

   Meanwhile, practically every style and form of discredited ex-politician is costing, we the taxpayers, millions and millions of dollars every year for their pensions.  Now, doesn’t that make you feel all warm inside?

   And there are so many other things going on. And, once again, there are those who are fighting back. Take the Drew Zahn (WND) example: "A Michigan woman is suing her county over limiting her petition gathering to a 3-by-3-foot square of ground in a 135-acre park, a restriction one attorney said is in the running for the title of the ‘most unconstitutional [free] speech zone ever.’

   "A park ranger told her she had to leave, and the Genesee County Parks office later confirmed that she needed a permit to petition signatures within the park. But after she applied for and received the permit, she discovered the parks office had limited her to a tiny ‘Freedom of Speech Area’ that she says is located 20 feet from a remote corner of a parking lot and far from foot traffic."  So much for the freedom of speech.

==========================

   The war goes on and on between our overbearing federal government and little Arizona.  But the brave little state continues to fight back, as always.  Evan Perez reports the current chapter in the saga in The Wall Street Journal.

   He writes: "Arizona filed suit ... against the U.S. government, challenging a portion of the 1965 Voting Rights Act that requires the state to get federal permission to make changes in its voting procedures.

   This writer feels that such federal control should not be arbitrarily applied to one state and not to another. And, in fact, where does it have such an authority over any state?

   Of course we don’t have that problem in California where a Democrat controlled legislature has redistricted the Republican party almost out of existence in some areas.  Ah, but that’s all right there. It’s the initiation of a political re-alignment that is most advantageous for the political forces in power.

   One more nail in America’s coffin.

==========================

   It is certainly no secret that Obamacare is putting America’s health into critical care.  Newspaper stories are beginning to show an admission of a considerable increase in the cost of healthcare premiums, among other things.

   Even Obama has had to admit he underestimated the cost of his Obamacare to the tune of over 50 billion dollars a year! (As reported by Fox News, and others.)

   And this current administration seems absolutely determined to turn a deaf ear to any responsible advice and offers of help to get things under control. Why this is so, they may not even understand themselves.  It’s just the way they are.

   Among so many other needed fixes — a move away from price fixing, which has proven to be very costly in the long run. It has been suggested that alternatives should be explored, such as concierge physician assistance.  This was one of the ideas from John C. Goodman, the head of the National Center for Policy Analysis.

   Another idea was offered to Obama from the top man at IBM, Samuel J. Palmisano. This company offered a considerable amount of help to significantly reduce Medicare fraud in amounts that could be almost a trillion dollars.

   And how much would this cost? — absolutely nothing!  It was offered for free!  Isn’t that fantastic? And what’s even more fantastic, Obama and his people just flatly turned it down.  That’s right.  That’s what happened.  It’s all part of the public record.  They weren’t interested.

   It is being recognized more and more that the current administration is not at all interested in new ideas, cooperation, or anything else other than their own very rigid ideology.  We know, they say otherwise, but this is the way they actually operate. That is what is actually observed and experienced.

   It would seem that about the only way the growing problems can be addressed, is by direct challenge, in the courts, at the ballot box, and elsewhere.

   As revealed by Jon Christian Ryter, "A multifaceted attack on Obamacare has begun in state legislatures and, simultaneously in the US district Court of Virginia, in Richmond.

   And, as reported in the WSJ, " ‘The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken, or forgotten, the Constitution is written.’ –Chief Justice John Marshall, writing in Marbury v. Madison (1803).

   So, with these and other actions, such as Kansas returning a $31.5 million "Trojan Horse" health exchange grant, the counterattack moves forward. May our country be the winner in this race against time.

==========================

   Unions seem to be visibly adding to the unrest and general instability growing in our nation.  We see so much that shows us this.  We see a union walk-out at Verizon and then we hear of other things.

   As The Wall Street Journal reports, "Verizon said it has found evidence of vandalized equipment and said picketing laborers prevented replacement workers from entering or exiting some job sites."

   And in other news we learn that labor unions have taken a negative position against the construction of a 1,700-mile oil pipeline intended to help our desperate energy needs.  The span is intended to extend from Canada to Texas.

   And the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), under the direction of the Obama administration, is more than happy to add to the difficulties.  The Right To Work foundation reveals that, "The NLRB — far exceeding its authority — is now forcing its way into private-sector workplaces nationwide, even if workers don’t want to labor under union-boss control and if the company has never been accused of an ‘unfair labor practice.’

"Mom and Pop shops, small businesses, larger companies — even some religiously-affiliated organizations — are now under the Obama Labor Board’s microscope."  It’s happening, even as the American economy declines, which seems to be partly as a result of all of these things and more.

==========================

   The majority of the media is up to its usual tricks. And as reported in The Washington Times, "Tim Groseclose, political science professor at the University of California at Los Angeles, reveals all in his new book ‘Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind.’

   We also see how that mainstream media has treated the Sarah Palin documentary film, "The Undefeated," (if they mannaged to mention it at all). And as The Blaze reports, "MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough has some tough words for Michele Bachmann."

   As further noted, "While discussing his take on last night’s (Aug.11) GOP debate, the ‘Morning Joe’ host spouted off, unleashing several attacks on the GOP Rep. and calling her a ‘joke’ several times and in many different ways and also targeting Iowans who are thinking of voting for her."

   The Patriot Action Network contributed some interesting facts to the issue as well: "On the Hannity Show, 2012 (black) Presidential contender and former Godfather Pizza CEO Herman Cain blasted back at Janeane Garofalo who last week accused Cain of being a paid plant by the Republican Party to deflect racism."

   In other areas of examination we find much of media continuing to pay the price of skewed reporting. Metro papers and others have hunkered down and continue to cut staff and reduce their pages.  By example, we hear Gannett, the big newspaper chain, is laying off an additional 700 employees.  And AOL doesn’t look so good under the bias leadership of Huffington.

   And the left-wing Mexican millionaire, Carlos Slim, moved to increase his ownership of The New York Times to 7.3%.  And while all of that has been going on, a Wenzel Strategies public-opinion survey (for WND) shows that the more conservative Fox News is considered as the most trusted national news network.

   It’s really amazing.  The left-wing media certainly can’t be ignorant about the public’s desire for the rest of the story, and how that’s been negatively effecting their bottom line. I t would seem, like so many other extremists in today’s world, they are willing to sacrifice themselves, if necessary, on the alter of a rigid, all-controlling political ideology.

   This sort of thing has happened many times in human history and the results are rather often quite disturbing, to say the least.  Maybe we can learn something here?  Maybe some of us can.  But don’t hold your breath waiting for the journalists and editors to develop minds of their own.

==========================

   The left is determined to paint the Tea Party as a great villain.  As GBTV noted, "When you can’t win the argument, there is always the route John Kerry chose. He told the media they had a responsibility to ignore the Tea Party."

   Roger Stockton (Western Representation PAC) lets us know that, "Rep. Maxine Waters told us (the Tea Party people) to go ‘straight to hell.’ ... Rep. Frederica Wilson called us (the Tea Party people) the ‘real enemy.’ ... Jesse Jackson, at a Martin Luther King memorial luncheon in Washington, DC, once again called us (the Tea Party people) ‘racists.’ "

   So, just what is this big, terrible boogie-man?  What is this Tea Party?  They don’t seem to know or perhaps they do know and they want you to think it’s something else.

   You see, it’s not a single group and it doesn’t have a central authority, as the liberals have.  It doesn’t have one or even a group of dominant, controlling leaders.

   What is it?  Why, it’s all of us who want our country back.  It’s folks who want a smaller federal government and one that’s financially stable.  It’s blacks who prefer to think for themselves.  It’s other minorities who are truly independent.  It’s Republicans.  It’s even some Democrats.  It’s folks who don’t identify with any specific party.  It’s Americans who want our freedoms returned to the people.  It’s as simple as that.

   The left is fighting against "we the people," as the Patriot Action Network (and so many others) have shown us with such informative reports, as from Eric Odom who writes: "With tens of millions of dollars flowing into Wisconsin on behalf of the union hacks, pushing recalls is only part of the assault on the will of the voters.

   "There is also now a campaign of bully tactics underway and tea party people are being forced to quickly move rally locations."  One example: "The Tea Party Express is hosting a plethora of Tea Party rallies across Wisconsin in an effort to push back against the unions driving the recalls.  While on the road to Kenosha, WI, we learned the venue was no longer willing to host the Tea Party rally due to threats and constant bullying."

   Meanwhile, the left continues to fault tea party folks for our national downgrade.  Yes, that’s like blaming the firefighters for the fire, as suggested by Sean Lengell.  Well of course.

==========================

   As we all have seen, our educational system in America is still failing much of the time.  We see that the educational districts in most states have been failing to properly raise the standards for math and reading exams, with expected results.

   We find unacceptable numbers of high school graduates are just not ready for college at all.  And, as reported by Ben Wolfgang in The Washington Times, " ‘Test-driven policies which claim to be improving U.S. schools have, in fact, failed by their own standards,’ said Bob Schaeffer, public education director at the National Center for Fair and Open Testing."

   Now more and more concerned parents and others are taking a serious look at "tenure."  And new books are shedding some much needed light on the problem, such as "The Faculty Lounges and Other Reasons Why You Won’t Get the College Education You Paid For" by Naomi Schaefer Riley.

   Is the primary answer additional massive spending for education?  Paul E. Peterson (in the WSJ) answers that, "Americans think so, until they hear that we spend $13,000 per student already."

   The Wall Street Journal, always concerned with such issues, gives us a number of things to think about. "Super teachers alone can’t save our schools. Extraordinary educators are rare and often burn out."  To save our schools, says Steven Brill, "...we have to demand more from ordinary teachers and their unions." And, in an editorial, "When teachers unions make it next to impossible to fire bad instructors or close the worst-performing schools, it’s obvious students aren’t their primary concern.

   "Now a new study suggests unions are opposing education reforms that an increasing number of their members support."  And, in a book review of "Class Warfare" and "Special Interest" it is observed that "The reformers who want to save the public schools are starting to make a difference, against ferocious opposition."

   Progress is occurring, little by little, as Stephanie Banchero wrote: "This fall, New York City will open P-Tech, a unique six-year high school where students can earn a diploma and an associate’s degree in a computer-science-related field and then get first crack at a job with IBM. ... The new school was in large part created by IBM International Foundation."

   Way to go!

==========================

   Unfortunately, we see violence in just about every part of the Muslim world.  This now even includes the Muslim region of China.  We also are finding al Qaeda connections to at least one major, active Nigerian group.

   Things are no better in Israel, with criticism mounting over housing construction in disputed zones, violence rising on the Israeli border, and Israel sending ships to their border area with Egypt, while Iran starts to deploy significant elements of its fleet in the Red Sea.

   And Iran has sentenced two young American hikers to eight years in prison — Iran’s latest hostage play. (No doubt to be released when they think it will generate favorable results.)  Also, Syria continues to kill its own people in ever larger numbers in what is now a bloody civil war.

   While all of that is going on, the organizers and developers of the "ground zero" Mosque are holding a fundraiser, intended to coincide with the 10-year anniversary of the 9/11 attack.  And, as you might imagine, in this same general time period, AP has advised its reporters that they should no longer use the phrase "ground zero" Mosque.

   And, if that isn’t enough, Art Moore, on World Net Daily reports that, "The powerful Washington Islamic lobby group (established as a front for the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas) is asking a federal judge to expunge all copies of a WND book that exposes its ties to radical jihad through original documents secured in a daring undercover operation."

   The lobbying group he’s talking about is the Council on American-Islamic Relations.  We feel, most sincerely, that it joins a total picture of an out-of-control movement that seriously threatens peace and security in today’s world.  Be warned.

==========================

   Once again California leads the nation with its brainless lawmaking, of course with our federal government close behind.  Jarrett Stepman made some cogent observations in an issue of Human Events this month.

   "With a budget deficit over $20 billion, newly elected California Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown faces the pressing need to take measures to solve the state’s crumbling finances.  Brown and his Democratic allies in the state legislature, however, have decided instead to take on such issues as immigration reform, passing and signing the Dream Act."

   It is one of the most expensive actions that can be taken by a state for the illegals who have broken into our country in defiance of our laws.

   As Stepman further noted, "The California Dream Act, which is an amnesty program for illegal immigrants, will allow illegal aliens who are students to take advantage of private financial aid.  It will also, of course, incentivize more border-hoppers to flood the state’s taxpayer-supported public university system."

   It is part of the massive welfare aid to illegals in the state.  It is helping measurably to bring about the pending collapse of the previously golden state. Meanwhile, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency has proposed a new salary plan that should help to weaken our border patrol.  The agents can be expected to lose many thousands of dollars in salary. Now isn’t that nice?

   We might also add that Representative Joe Wilson was right when he shouted that the president was lying.  As it turns out, illegal immigrants will be covered under Obamacare.

   As The Patriot Action Network reports, "Under Obama’s health care law, the Department of Health and Human Services plans to hand out money to local health centers specifically targeted to serve communities where illegal immigrants are likely to be a considerable percentage of those receiving care."

   And, in a counterattack, Prince William County in Virginia is suing the federal government to gain access to illegal aliens records, something they should not have had to do — if we were following our own laws.

   And so it goes this month with the invasion of America.

==========================

   So, how is our security doing in other areas?  Well, as Jon Christian Ryter reports, "The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has arrogantly threatened to cancel all flights in and out of Texas by shutting down all airports in that state if a Texas bill that criminalizes TSA pat-downs that include touching the anus, sexual organs, buttocks or breasts of another person through their clothing is passed into law."

   We understand that some pat-downs are not so intrusive while others could only be described (and are so described) as extreme sexual harassment.  It would seem to be a matter of who is doing the job. Something needs to be done about this?  I most certainly think so.

   On the China front, Rep. Frank R. Wolf has issued a statement that our space technology is being shared much too freely with Communist China.  It was also reported that China has evidently developed some sort of anti-carrier pulse weapon.  Observers tell us that the way we have been operating with our international security, we are really asking for it.

   Of course what we are doing is to reduce our military to dangerous levels.  That’s the way we seem to be answering these threats.

   Congressman Buck McKeon, the Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee gave us the stats on this.  In 1990 we had 76 army brigades. — Today we have 45.  In 1990 we had 546 major naval ships. — Today we have 288.  In 1990 we had 82 USAF fighter squadrons. — Today we have 39.  In 1990 we had 360 strategic bombers. — Today we have 154.

   I’ll bet you feel so much safer now when you go to bed at night, right?

==========================

   Many religious communities in America feel more and more like they are under siege.  New York Mayor Bloomberg announced the end of tolerance with his edict that, for the 9/11 ceremony, there will be no religious leaders or first-responders invited.

   It has also been reported, by The Patriot Action Network (and others) that, once again "...the developers of the Ground Zero Mosque have applied for a federally-funded grant to help build the mosque withing sight of Ground Zero."

   Now the Network reports that, "Our sources indicate that the status of the Ground Zero Mosque is unknown — LMDC (Lower Manhattan Development Corporation) has made no determination on the application or that determination has not been made public."

   In other news, Ironic Surrealism has posted that, "The United West ‘Strike Team’ attended a Sheriff Baca Town Hall meeting at the Islamic Center of Los Angeles. ... This is the same one that was founded by a protege of Hassan al Banna."  Our intelligence and theirs both indicate that he is one of the originators of The Muslim Brotherhood.

   It was further reported that "The LA County Sheriff’s Emergency Operations Bureau, Muslim Community Affairs Unit, a taxpayer funded entity, was the presenting agency."  And, "Steve Whitmore, LASD Senior Media Advisor, confirmed the Muslim Community Affairs Unit receives taxpayer funds of approximately $128,400 per year for two full-time deputies.

   It would seem there might be something to be learned from all of this, wouldn’t you say?

   And, finally, as Jon Christian Ryter reveals, "Channel 12 in Winston-Salem, NC reported on Aug. 13 that residents in Elm Towers, a high-rise public housing apartment building on South Elm Street in Highpoint, NC were ordered by the Highpoint Housing Authority to cease and desist from holding ‘inherently religious’ Christian worship services in a common area on the first floor of the high-rise apartment building.

   "Religious services have been held in a private, common-use room in the building for many years to benefit seniors who are too old or feeble to attend regular church services, even with assisted transportation."  Anyone want to tell us how they think things would have gone if it had been a Muslim meeting?

   We all remember ACORN, right?  You may recall that they were found to have submitted at least 888 phony registrations of voters in Florida, felony charges were filed against a number of their people in the state of Washington, over 1,700 alleged fraudulent registrations, and similar events occurred in Pennsylvania, Ohio, etc, etc. — in a total of 12 different states.

   You may also recall that Obama was asked if he knew about the group and what had happened.  He answered, "Frankly, it’s not something I followed closely."  Yes, but what about his actual involvement working for ACORN?  Oh, we don’t want to talk about that.

   Now we hear that Obama and his government lackeys have given a grant to ACORN — in clear violation of the law.  (ACORN has changed its name to Affordable Housing Centers of America, in case you’re interested.)

   Another example of how we taxpayers are being taken to the cleaners by government funded, questionable organizations — Planned Parenthood.

   With abortion still their primary activity and with those very revealing undercover videos still fresh in our minds, Cheryl Wetzstein (The Washington Times) indicates that "Planned Parenthood gets $363 million a year from taxpayers, says Charmaine Yoest, Americans United For Life president and chief executive."

   And, you may remember, a sizeable amount of that money somehow seems to have just vanished.  It doesn’t seem to be able to be accounted for. Interesting.

==========================

   Our environment is perceived to be a problem so the answer seems to be to disrupt absolutely everything and seriously diminish the business community, even if it is destroyed in the process.

   To begin with, we find the leading environmental icon becoming more radicalized with every passing minute.  As GBTV reports, "Apparently Al Gore thinks the Arab Spring is going swell because he’s calling for one like it to sweep across the United States of America. He wants people to rise up and take to the streets."

   And, as reported on the FireWire, "During a speech delivered last week at the Aspen Institute in Colorado, former Vice President Al Gore became frustrated and unleashed a string of obscenities."  Yes, this is really happening.  I have gotten detailed reports and have even watched the videos.

   Meanwhile, our presiding dictatorship has gotten into a major battle against Exxon over a huge and very important oil find — a discovery that is vital for us all, and our government is evidently inclined to do what it can to restrict, limit or possibly even close down.

   And while that is happening, we find the EPA’s major restrictions on American industry, are strangling what is left of America’s business economy.  Even the greatest American guitar manufacturer, still in America for now, has been stopped dead in its tracks.

   As The Wall Street Journal’s Eric Felten writes, "Federal agents swooped in on Gibson Guitar ... raiding factories and offices in Memphis and Nashville, seizing several pallets of wood, electronic files and guitars.

   What about other guitar manufacturers who are similarly innocent?  They were not raided.  You see, the Gibson owner had made significant political donations to the conservative cause.  It would seem that Holder’s Gestapo Justice Department is at it again. This administration has got to be stopped!

   Meanwhile, in Texas, "...wind turbines proved to be a green flop.  On the afternoon of Aug. 2 2011, when electricity demand hit 67,919 megawatts, the maximum output ‘ERCOT’ could pull from their expensive green experiment was 1,500 megawatts of electricity, or 2.2% of the demand, even though the designers of the system assured Texas it would deliver 15% of peak demand."  (As researched and written by Jon Christian Ryter.)

   That, and so many other examples, would suggest that such solutions for pollution and climate change are not what you would call effective.  And so, what about our climate?  Is it warming?  The actual answer seems to be "yes" and "no."  That is, climate change is normal and by natural causes.  Sometimes it’s warmer and at other times it’s colder.

   Sometimes the greatest influence is from volcanoes and sometimes it’s due to a small increase in our sun’s energy output.  Our instrumented monitoring has clearly established this fact.

   It should also be noted that recent warming seems to be related to a corresponding spike in energy from the sun.  Can we be sure about that?  Instruments monitoring the sun showed this to be the case and instruments monitoring the planet Mars showed us that the Southern Polar Cap on that planet was receding, beyond the seasonal variant, during that corresponding period.

   And yes, human activity has had an impact, but it has not been nearly as large as we’ve been told.  And yes, even if it had no climatic impact, it is a good idea not to quickly use up all our energy resources and trash the planet in the process — but also it would not be good to practice planetary husbandry in a way that ruins us all financially, and especially to the point where it ends up destroying our civilization.

   And then we also have new information from time to time, such as from the Institute of Marine Science.  It reported, in the UK’s New Scientist magazine that a British tribunal has ruled that global warming doesn’t exist.

   And also a few news articles have surfaced that show a significant number of mistakes have been made in important research papers.  The retractions that are beginning to surface verify this most embarrassing turn of events.  So, with all of that, and all the rest, it is not an easy game to call.

==========================

   History will show that there have been a number of players on the American stage, doing all that they can to bring about a metamorphism of the great American experiment.  It is change that we now find is profoundly destroying the very nation that they would make into something else.

   And just who are the most important of those players?  One might say Obama or Holder or Frank or any number of others, but only somewhat in the shadows is a figure that is like something or someone that was fashioned from some sort of work of rather disturbing fiction.  But he is not fiction.  He is all too real.  This writer, and others who have researched this issue, believe him to be a man named George Soros. Oh yes, we have told you about him before, but there is always more.

   You may be aware of the media empire that he has financed for his special propaganda purposes.  It is extensive.  It is worldwide.  As Dan Gainor, VP of the Media Research Center tells us, "It gives him incredible influence.  Every month, reporters, writers and bloggers at the many outlets he funds easily reach more than 330 million people around the globe."

   He has been the greatest benefactor of Obama and everyone else on the far-left.  And the President hasn’t forgotten that.  Obama has moved to rein in hedge-fund managers and other gamblers and manipulators within the money system, but "...he lets the Soros exemptions to his attack-the-rich rules slide like butter on a hot plate," as reported by Michelle Malkin in The Washington Times.

   One of Soros’ latest manipulations is in various political battleground states by massive funding of liberals to Secretary of State positions as overseers of voting results.  The thing that is almost criminal about it is that the only possible advantage he could ever have in doing this would be to guarantee manipulation of results if necessary.  That’s the only advantage we can find.

   Of course there should be no "almost" about any possible criminality here, according to many observers.  But this is a changed America and such as this is now possible and so much more as well.

   And his influence is everywhere else as well. As WND’s Aaron Klein observes, "A former Jordanian diplomat widely quoted in news media in recent months, calming fears about the Muslim Brotherhood, is a Mideast specialist for a peace institute funded by billionaire George Soros."

   It would seem that George Soros has become a frightening Machiavellian character on the world stage.